Blog

Lifelong learning… or how I learned not to waste a moment

This has been a nice quiet week at Directis – I’ve just wrapped up final reports on a few projects and I’m waiting for a couple of new projects to begin next week. In years past I would have used a week like this to go shopping, stay home and read novels, or surf Facebook. I guess I must have grown up sometime in the last 12-18 months because this week I’ve actually been just as busy as when there were five projects in the cooker.

Here are some of the topics I’ve been researching and working on this week:

  • industry research – getting to know the lay of the land in two new industries where I have customers or prospects, so I can respond intelligently to their business challenges and opportunities.
  • business governance (as opposed to non-profit governance) – finding ways to translate “corporate” governance models from the land of the Fortune 500 to family businesses or just small businesses.
  • Certified Management Consultant designation – I have started compiling engagement summaries from the past few years to present my qualifications for the CMC designation.
  • Appreciative Inquiry as a basis for strategic planning – if you got my newsletter you read the article about building from your strengths.

I’ve been a busy little beaver! I know that in a couple of months it will be time for my annual Birthday strategic planning retreat, so I’m also looking at my strat plan and reflecting on what’s been done, what is outstanding and what became irrelevant as the year wore on and things evolved. In short, I’m doing outstandingly well on my goals and there will be some key strategic decisions to make this summer about how I take it onwards from here.

Read the 2 Comments and add yours

ROI and Social Media

On this fine Saturday afternoon, I am sitting on a bench overlooking an arm of the Fraser River, across from the Olympic Oval in Richmond and just within wifi range of Harbour Air’s terminal. I’m reading a BCBusiness magazine, and there is an article about viral videos.

The article brings up the subject of how much money companies may (or may not) be spending on social media, and the fact that there are apparently companies popping up whose market offering is their expertise in measuring the effectiveness of social-video advertising.

Frankly, I think that anyone who purports to give you an adequate measure of the “effectiveness” of your social media is pulling one over on you. I have yet to see a reasonably disciplined, reliable and valid method of demonstrating the value of social media and, many experts have opined, on marketing as a whole. There’s the old nugget “we know that 50% of our marketing is working; we just don’t know which 50%.”

I am open to being corrected, but I think that consultants claiming to show you ROI on your social media budget (counting both time and money) are going to, at best, describe some qualitative signs that your brand perception has shifted. Hopefully they will have a sample size of customers that is statistically significant, and they will have employed some kind of valid research techniques including control groups etc. to tell you that there is a causal relationship between your social media activities and increases in your revenue. Because frankly, having people “feel good” about your company isn’t worth diddly-squat until it translates into dollars paid. From what I’ve seen, most social media practitioners/consultants are unable to make that link conclusively.

I’m not advocating for people to ditch their social media, just that they not fool themselves that it is a speculative and unproven thing to spend your money on. Back there in business school we were taught to look at what the ROI and “return period” is for an investment, and decide what is a reasonable time frame for the results of a decision to yield a positive gain over the amount spent. Social media hasn’t really been around long enough to conclusively show that it has a positive ROI for many of not most companies who are making those investments. That doesn’t say you shouldn’t do it – but caveat emptor. And don’t believe anyone who can tell you they can measure your results – they might give you a # of hits or click-throughs but only YOU can measure the result in your bottom line.

Tagged as , ,
Be the first to leave a comment

What’s a mandate? Should we have one?

A few organizations I’ve worked with recently have discussed adding a “mandate” to their strategic plan to describe their purpose with a little more detail than their “mission statement” which they wish to make short and memorable.

This points to the problem of SEMANTICS which is haunting strategic planning, and turning into an icky mess of word-smithery. This is really more a non-profit organization issue more than a small business issue, because most entrepreneurs don’t have to coordinate a decision-making group like a board, so strategic planning is more direct and less inclined to get into lengthy debates over mission statement wording.

Let me say two things:

  1. Call it whatever you want it, but make sure your organization is very clear about its purpose and how it will be relevant to everyone involved.
  2. Mandate, as officially defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, is “an official order or commission to do something.” Read further into the definition and you’ll see that a mandate comes from somebody else, usually with official authority or law-making capacity.

Technically, all non-profit organizations do have an official “mandate” because they are granted the right to incorporate as a Society under the Societies Act for a specific, stated purpose. Some societies receive charitable registration status which further defines their boundaries (you have to name a charitable purpose on Q11 of your application form). One could say that those are official orders or commissions to do something.

The trouble with using the Society purpose or CRA charitable purpose as part of your strategic plan is that when you register with these official bodies, it is to your advantage to be as vague as possible to give plenty of room for adaptation and flexibility throughout the (possibly eternal) life of your organization. They are definitely not useful statements when it comes to strategy, which is all about making choices of how to use limited resources to achieve the most benefit.

So if you have a “Mandate” written in your strategic plan that does not equal your Society purpose or CRA purpose, you might feel a little worried. Don’t be. Assuming you haven’t just ditched that purpose and gone off in a completely different direction, the chances are strong that you’re still staying within the boundaries of your official mandate.

But now, what to do with this part of your strategic plan that you’ve nicknamed your “Mandate.” Well – is it clear? Does it tell people what your organization does and who it serves? Consider just dropping the “Mandate” title and wrapping it into your mission statement. Call it whatever you like if it is useful and serves to focus the organization. Just remember that “mandate” has a definition related to an official order or instruction, so people outside your planning group may interpret your words accordingly.

Tagged as , ,
Be the first to leave a comment

Do-it-yourself Board Governance design?

Board governance topics have come up a lot for me lately, and I’ve been reading a veritable flood of books and papers on the subject. Two things have occurred to me: first, board governance authors seem to write in either overly academic language, or they try to dumb things down to the point of patronizing. As a language and writing nerd, this bothers me.

The second and much more important thing that I have observed is how prescriptive each model or expert seems to be about the role of the Board. The Board’s role is either to create the strategic plan, OR it is NOT to create strategy but rather oversee and approve it. Huh? Whether you look at working boards, policy boards, Policy Governance boards, or whatever model you want to dredge up, there are differing but very definitive prescriptions for how Board members are to connect (or not connect) with staff, leadership and customers.

Frankly I’m getting kind of tired of the back-and-forth… makes me feel like I’m trying to decide whether or not a glass of red wine is good for me. (I usually decide on “yes”).

I’m beginning to feel that Boards should build their own governance model based on the age & stage of their organization, the personalities and skills of the people involved, and the needs of stakeholders. Don’t forget the operating context either. There are so many factors that are at play in determining whether a Board using XX Board Model Trend Of The Year can be successful in helping an organization move forward and be useful.

This reminds me of one of my favourite facilitation questions when people are trying to make a decision: “What would be most useful in helping us move forward?” The other relevant question is “What is likely to actually work given our situation and resources?”

The long and short of it is, I believe, Boards need to design themselves. Use the best practices out there, but take no model at face value.

Be the first to leave a comment

Keeping Score & Measuring Impact: Part 1

As the old adage goes, “what gets measured gets managed.” This is entirely true for almost every human endeavour we can imagine, and it gives rise to a healthy discussion around what one measures.

In business school, my management accounting professor told us a cautionary tale of a city works department that began measuring the amount of asphalt used by their pothole-fixing-crews as a way of checking on how productive the crews were being. My professor, who at one time had been a shovel-wielding road crew member, asked us to imagine what kinds of results that measurement would have. Did more potholes get fixed when asphalt use went up? Nope… but the holes dug on each pothole got deeper. Be careful what you ask for, was the moral of the story to our class of budding managers.

If measurement is such a key part of managing, in the for-profit or not-for-profit sectors, how do we do it well, so that we encourage the intended outcome? And how do we measure things without putting a load of bureaucratic nonsense in the way of getting things done? Read on for a few thoughts about this. read more…

Be the first to leave a comment

Your Mission, If You Choose To Accept It

One of the central tasks of strategic planning is to define the mission for your organization. It is not quite Mission: Impossible but I hope that I don’t scare off new readers by reassuring all of you who have struggled with this that defining the mission is not for the faint of heart.

Definitions of the “mission statement” abound. Some people use a slogan or tagline and call it their mission statement. Some marketing communications experts would like your mission to be snappy and appealing. The entirely left-brained among us want the mission to be as concrete as possible, preferably without requiring a philosophical “fuzzy” dialogue (fortunately there are not too many of those folks).

Some criteria for a good mission statement:

  1. It should provide a focus and direction for the organization.
  2. It should make clear what client group the organization serves.
  3. It should make clear what needs the organization serves for that client group.
  4. It should be clearly understandable – as a litmus test, a new staff person or volunteer might be asked “does this tell you what we do?”
  5. It should express the organization’s purpose.

A mission statement needs to be succinct. If it is full of “this and that”, then the crafters of the statement have not done the work required to truly focus. The statement should also not be so vague that it could apply to other organizations in your space.

Focus your mission statement for the near and mid-term future. Allow your vision statement to express what change you wish to bring about through your actions. Let your values describe how you conduct yourself.

Coming up with this statement is NOT easy, let me tell you! But it helps to have everybody on the same page about what kind of statement you’re working on, so you’re all reaching for the same gold ring.

 

Be the first to leave a comment

Top 5 +1 Reasons Why People Avoid Strategic Planning

5) It has become synonymous with flakey team-building activities.

How many times do you need to fall backwards into your co-workers’ arms in this life? Well… never, actually. Unfortunately, the idea of getting away from the office for a planning day with your staff conjures up all kinds of lame stereotypes about “wilderness weekends” and “trust walks.” The good news is that strategic planning doesn’t actually involve any of that stuff. It’s extremely focused in reality. No fluff. Focus on what you want to do, and what’s got to be done to get there. Get everybody’s agreement on a set of measurements for success, and lay out your actions so you can keep each other accountable. No kum-bai-yah.

4) Nobody needs another vision statement on a coffee mug.

In giant corporate businesses, “visioning” can take days because many senior VPs have to agree on the direction. Then it gets printed on coffee mugs so nobody forgets, because the business is so huge that’s the best way to get the message out. In your small business or non-profit organization, the vision is pretty cut & dried usually: be reasonably financially sustainable doing what you’re good at (and in the non-profit world, doing what makes a positive impact). Once you’ve got that articulated, move on to how you’re going to get there. As for communicating, leave people’s coffee mugs out of it. Just sit down with them and talk about it. No need for fanfares or slogans.

3) We’re in a growth phase right now, so there’s no point in planning.

So… you’re going to launch a rocket and you haven’t decided what to point it at? When people talk about being in a growth phase as an excuse not to plan, I wonder, and I worry, how they know whether they’re going to be profitable or sustainable at the end of the growth. How are they sure they’re going to be able to keep it up at their new pace? Doing
growth without a plan is really flying by the seat of your pants: you’d better have a darn good tailor. A strategic plan doesn’t require you to stop everything or put your growth on hold. The only wrong way to do a plan is not to plan at all.

2) We don’t know how to do strategic planning, and it sounds pretty academic to me.

Yep, there are lots of high-falutin’ buzzwords and noble concepts in the field of strategic planning, I’ll give you that. Some people prefer to steer clear of things they don’t know how to do because, let’s face it, we’re all learning at the speed of light just trying to keep the show going. Imagine, though, how you got by in your work in the early days when you didn’t know the efficient ways of working. Did you have someone show you the ropes? You had to learn it, but after you did, it became second nature. There are lots of people out
there – and lots of videos online for free – that can help you learn about strategic planning so you can be more efficient at leading your business.

1) We’re too busy to stop for strategic planning.

This is by far the most frequent complaint of all business owners or non-profit leaders.
I’ll confess, I’m often so busy I’d rather just keep my head down and do what I know will make me money. Alas, you can spend a lot of years with your head down, making money, but when you finally stop to look around (maybe 15 years later) will you like where you find yourself?

Be busy going somewhere meaningful: profit on its own is no motivator for the human soul. When you get to the end of your life, do you want to say “I worked so hard and I ended up where I planned to be” or “I worked so hard – how did I end up here?” Strategic planning helps you make sure you’re going to have something of value in the future - something you can sell, pass on to family or trusted employees, or just ride into the sunset with an honourable legacy.

Bonus: The # 1 AAA Reason People Don’t Do Strategic Planning — We Don’t Have The Money!

This applies in different ways to non-profits and small businesses.

The funding environment for non-profits is extremely harsh these days, and even healthy organizations have a hard time justifying more overhead for planning. Especially when donors are looking at your overhead ratios and the newspapers seem to lynch anybody who spends more than 1% of their funds raised on anything other than programs (okay, that’s an exaggeration, but you get the point). Yes – I get it – it’s VERY hard to allocate funds to strategic planning.

But here is the thing: examining your organization’s impact – not just its programs delivered but what they actually achieve out there in the world – is at the very heart of strategic planning. When you know what impact you seek to have (and are successful at having), it becomes ever so much easier to communicate a compelling reason for donors/funders to support you.

What if you could spend $2500-$5000 once every two to three years, and become 25% more successful on your grant proposals because you can tell the story of your organization better? Does that look like good ROI to you? Then what if that same $2500-$5000 provided a guideline for how to use your scarce resources to magnify and leverage your impact on your clients, by knowing what programs, equipment, etc. is most relevant to your goals?

For small businesses, a strategic planning project may seem like an unnecessary luxury. It *is* if all you do is navel-gaze and come up with a pretty mission statement. *shudder* What should happen is the “directional” stuff about mission and goals should get hammered out right away – quickly, neatly – and then you should move on to discussing how to make that mission come to life, by prioritizing your actions and making people accountable for results. A budget and some operations manuals usually follow. The cost of planning varies from business to business (it’s in the $2500-10,000 ballpark) but the point is, it’s not meant to be a cost that just sits on your overhead and does nothing. You use strategic planning to make good decisions, avoid bad decisions, and make everybody work together more effectively. For each business, the financial impact will be different but the more people you have to get working together in a coordinated fashion, the more important it is to have a plan to pull it all together.

No more using lack of money as an excuse, folks.

 

I’m going to be writing in the next few weeks about measuring and planning for impact, because I’m doing a lot of reading and thinking about it. For non-profits, don’t let this common reason to avoid strategic planning stand between you and the opportunity to really improve your impact.

Be the first to leave a comment

The 1970s called. They want their management models back.

I’m starting to get tired of hearing “business experts” give advice based on studies or research that was done in the 1960s and 1970s. The whole world has changed since then. Business is vastly different. The same management models that were gospel in the Watergate era… well those are the ones that grew up and gave us WorldCom and Enron.

Let’s look at a few examples.

How about performance-based compensation and bonuses? That sounds like a wonderful idea in theory: employers should pay employees based on how much value they’re providing through their work. Aha, but it’s not working, is it? With a few special exceptions where short-term focus without long-term learning is desired, performance-based compensation doesn’t actually lead to increases in productivity. It just gets expensive, because over time people come to expect more rewards for the same behaviour. (Oops I have to contradict myself here: Alfie Kohn has been right against performance-based compensation since the 1970s, but nobody listened to him until Daniel Pink wrote a book using most of the same ideas in the 2000s and then made an RSAnimate video about it which went viral).

How about Michael Porter’s ideas; he’s one of the most prolific management-concept-thinker-uppers out there right now. Some of his gems provide a good starting point for discussion, but need to be updated as they stand. When I learned Porter’s Five Forces in business school ten years ago, they were already teaching updates to the model.

I’m not going to go through and debunk all of the management models out there. For the most part, they are useful starting points to provide some discipline to your strategic thinking. However they are dangerous if you allow one model or school of thought to influence your whole approach. You need to amalgamate and synthesize the ideas to go with your own operating environment and the shifting needs of your customers. Basically every leader needs to become a DJ of ideas and create their own mash-up.

Be the first to leave a comment

What kind of impact do you make?

It’s been my pleasure to have some discussions with several successful and talented people in small business and not-for-profit organizations recently around the topic of impact. More specifically, what is the impact we make on our clients and society as a result of our actions?

For entrepreneurs, impact is most often measured by the profits generated by the company. If you are financially successful, it is assumed that you’re offering a product or service that your customers view as having value, so they exchange money for it. You are able to generate that product or service for less money than what people are willing to pay. Henceforth, profit – and out of the jobs we create, the taxes we pay and perhaps the charitable donations we make, we can say we have a net positive impact on society.

On the not-for-profit side, impact is less easily quantified. What is the scorecard to be used in measuring how successful an organization is at saving dolphins, enriching lives, or protecting the weak? The Census doesn’t ask people subjective questions so there isn’t a statistically reliable (or not, alas) way to measure quality of life. I think this is one of the great challenges facing non-profit Boards: to define the social good in such a way that they can demonstrate a positive impact. And even if they could, they are still bound to a financial measure in that they have to be able to attract enough funding to deliver their services in a way that allows them to break-even or have a reinvestable surplus.

Jim Collins (author of Good to Great) has penned an addendum to that notable work, Good to Great for the Social Sectors. It’s actually available on Kindle (I read it on my iPad, having downloaded it via BC Ferries’ wifi connection last week – I ♥ mobility!) as well as printed form. It’s a quick read, and it will actually benefit people in for-profit, not-for-profit or anywhere in between, because it will make you think about your impact. Thanks to the fine folks at Power to Be Adventure Therapy for telling me about this book!

I also just watched the first 15 minutes of this video about Financial Planning for Startups, which talks about why money is important for startups: because the ability to generate money is the sign of a sustainable business model. I think the ability to generate money is one thing, but the ability to use it wisely – to create an impact – is something entirely different and much more important in profit and not-for-profit organizations. (Maybe if more people in the tech-start-up field were trying to use money wisely rather than just generate money, we’d have been spared the tech bubble and the ludicrous valuations of tech start-ups that do very little aside from look good and play foosball. But I digress).

I’m going to watch the rest of this video now… I just had to pause for this blogging moment.

 

Be the first to leave a comment

Strategy and culture face off…

Quality you can tasteFast Company published an article on their site entitled “Culture Eats Strategy for Lunch.” I barely got halfway through before my inner blogger started screaming “DISAGREE! DISAGREE!”

The major hypothesis of the article is that culture is more important than strategy, because without an organizational culture which favours accountability and responsibility, you can’t actually implement any strategy. I agree with that, but I also think many of the points the author, Shawn Parr, makes in support of his hypothesis actually prove that the relationship between culture and strategy is a two-way street.

A strong culture flourishes with a clear set of values and norms that actively guide the way a company operates. Employees are actively and passionately engaged in the business, operating from a sense of confidence and empowerment rather than navigating their days through miserably extensive procedures and mind-numbing bureaucracy.

There are lots of businesses out there that have a great culture. They are wonderful, nice places to come to work. Everybody’s having fun, everybody loves the company… but the company is slowly going bankrupt. Why? Because employees cannot productively engage in the business without knowing the purpose and direction they should be making an effort. That direction comes from… you guessed it… the strategy. Employees without a sense of the company’s strategy will engage all right… but in a shotgun scattered approach.

The article talks about accountability, which is a fabulous concept, but it depends on something: accountability to what? If there are no goals, no roadmap in place then you can have all the accountability in the world but it still doesn’t give you a successful company (or organization).

A poor culture can hamstring a good strategy, that is true. But a lack of strategy or a poor strategy can make the best culture in the world into nothing more than a big dance party on the Titanic. It’s going down… but aren’t we having fun?

Be the first to leave a comment